Comments on Licensing clarification.TypePad2006-04-24T15:26:05Zaudreythttps://pugs.blogs.com/pugs/tag:typepad.com,2003:https://pugs.blogs.com/pugs/2006/04/licensing_clari/comments/atom.xml/Matt Todd commented on 'Licensing clarification.'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d83451e8fb69e200d83485651653ef2006-04-25T04:32:15Z2007-08-18T20:29:00ZMatt Toddhttp://c.anvas.es/I certainly am glad that the MIT license was chosen. This project is quite fascinating: I'll be investigating both Haskell...<p>I certainly am glad that the MIT license was chosen.</p>
<p>This project is quite fascinating: I'll be investigating both Haskell and Perl(6) as to begin participating.</p>
<p>Also, Jifty appears to be pretty interesting, as well.</p>
<p>M.T.</p>Audrey T commented on 'Licensing clarification.'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d83451e8fb69e200d834baae1569e22006-04-24T17:42:08Z2007-08-18T20:17:45ZAudrey Tchromatic: I've now reflected README, as well as this entry, to reflect that I now intend for src/ to be...<p>chromatic: I've now reflected README, as well as this entry, to reflect that I now intend for src/ to be under the MIT license.</p>
<p>Thanks for your prompt feedback on this matter!</p>Audrey T commented on 'Licensing clarification.'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d83451e8fb69e200d834853c7653ef2006-04-24T17:27:22Z2007-08-18T20:17:15ZAudrey TChromatic: Thanks, that is very helpful. Surely all MIT license code can be relicensed into Artistic2, as recommended by TPF,...<p>Chromatic: Thanks, that is very helpful. Surely all MIT license code can be relicensed into Artistic2, as recommended by TPF, some time in the future, if needed be.</p>
<p>As an aside, are we still going with the +GPL? I thought one of A2b14's main feature over A2b5 is that it can be morphed into GPL at any time, in clause 4(c)(ii).</p>
<p>grumpY: Indeed, I was really tired out by this whole episode of trying to find ways to avoid the possibly-illegal current status of Pugs. I'm glad it's all coming to an end now, and look forward to finish implementing all the suggestions from TPF, so I can go back to coding for real.</p>chromatic commented on 'Licensing clarification.'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d83451e8fb69e200d834bab24869e22006-04-24T17:13:55Z2007-08-18T20:16:54Zchromatichttp://wgz.org/chromatic/I much prefer copyleft licenses, but as the MIT license does not disclaim copyright I can accept it for my...<p>I much prefer copyleft licenses, but as the MIT license does not disclaim copyright I can accept it for my contributions to Pugs itself.</p>
<p>For code included in the official Perl 6 distribution, I strongly prefer the Artistic/GPL combination recommended by the TPF.</p>
<p>I hope this is sufficient and helpful clarification.</p>grumpY! commented on 'Licensing clarification.'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d83451e8fb69e200d834baaad169e22006-04-24T16:53:17Z2007-08-18T20:51:58ZgrumpY!glad this is near resolution, these posts are not nearly as enjoyable as your code-focused posts. i have been trying...<p>glad this is near resolution, these posts are not nearly as enjoyable as your code-focused posts. </p>
<p>i have been trying to do some "real" coding in pugs. wow, people need to appreciate the colossal amount of work done there. its slow, but functional in ways i had not expected. and the docs are decent too.</p>